Chelsea lose again

English Premier League champions Chelsea suffered their second defeat in three days after they fell 0-1 to Seria A side Fiorentina at Stamford Bridge in their final pre-season friendly before the start of the new season. The EPL champions were not at their fluent best as Jose Mourinho made wholesale changes to the team that started in the Community Shield defeat to Arsenal on Sunday.

Amongst those that came in from the start were Asmir Begovic, Radamel Falcao, two youngsters at full back, academy product Ola Aina at right back, Betrand Traore at left back, which is not his natural position. Both Mikel Obi and Victor Moses started the match, while Oscar and Rueben Loftus-Cheek, John Terry and Kurt Zouma were in the first eleven on the night.

Fiorentina got the only goal of the night in the 34th minute through captian Rodriguez, after putting in a rebound from a lose ball in the penalty area.

Jose Mourinho's Chelsea have had an indifferent pre-season, losing to New-York Red Bulls, drawing with Barcelona, losing to Arsenal, before tonight’s defeat to the team that finished fourth in the Italian top flight last season.

While this piece explained the likely weaknesses in the Chelsea team and by extension its squad, this was obvious on Wednesday by the players Mourinho used to start in the full back positions. And the nature of the squad creates a picture where the first eleven represents a position of strength rather than the entire squad.

If the first 45 minutes belonged to Chelsea's second string, the second half saw the introduction of the players that will start in the Premier League opener against Swansea on Saturday, although they could do little to turn the tie around on the night.

Nothing can be read into results in friendly matches, as Chelsea will likely turn it around when the season starts in earnest. Though, with the season starting in three days time, the players seem to be feeling the effects of their long pre-season trips in America.

With Swansea the visitors this weekend at the Bridge, all will be forgotten as Jose Mourinho will look to begin the journey to retain the Premier League title his team won last season.

While the season opens, it is clear that the West London outfit would be looking to bring in some reinforcements in defence before the transfer window shuts on September 1st.

Chelsea line up against Fiorentina

Asmir Begovic; Ola Aina (Ivanovic 46mins), Kurt Zouma, John Terry (Cahill 46), Betrand Traore (Azpilicueta 46); Obi Mikel (Matic 46), Rueben Loftus-Cheek (Ramires 58); Victor Moses (Willian 58), Oscar (Fabregas 58), Juan Cuadrado (Hazard 58); Radamel Falcao (Remy 58)

Does Mourinho’s Chelsea have a weakness?

Sunday's Community Shield defeat to Arsenal was a rarity for Chelsea. The Premier League champions do not suffer lots of defeat, least of all to an Arsenal team managed by Arsene Wenger whom they were unbeaten against in 13 previous matches, before Sunday's match.

With the 2015/2016 season kicking off this weekend, Chelsea have again been installed by the bookies and football pundit as the favourite to retain their title. Prior to their triumph last season, the team already had an existing core of players, and their strength was a settled defence. The additions of Diego Costa and Cesc Fabregas was the principal reason they won the title as it increased their attacking efficiency, together with the displays of Eden Hazard, who won both players’ of  the year award for his performance.

However, with Chelsea's inability to put the ball in the back of the net against Arsenal, and the fact that they are a different team without Diego Costa, the question then is whether they could be said to have a weakness any opposition can exploit?

On the face of it, it could easily be said that the team lacks a weakness in his first eleven when everybody is fit. Although, the continuous use of Caesar Azpilicueta as a left back when he is a natural right back, despite his solid performance in his unnatural position could count as a weakness especially as he could find it difficult to cut out certain balls that is diverted to his weaker left foot. This was evident by the way Oxlade-Chamberlain moved the ball to his left before letting fly to score on Sunday. Being a right footer, his ability to adjust his body quickly enough could have affected his reaction.

That aside, the quality of the backups at Chelsea calls into question whether indeed there is no weakness in the squad. It was clear on Sunday that the dynamism and nonchalance that Diego Costa brings to the front line was missing. Loic Remy and Radamel Falcao had 45 minutes to show what they could offer in the absence of the big Spaniard, but both did little to suggest that they could be adequate replacement for him in the event that he was sidelined for a long period. It was evident that there were few crosses from Chelsea in the absence of Diego Costa, apparently, oblivious of the fact that those on the field do not thrive on crosses. The few crosses that came in were instead met by Ramires whose runs from midfield were not picked up.

In the absence of Diego Costa, Chelsea lacks a striker who can sufficiently offer what he would, and opposition defences are bound to breath easy in his absence.

During Chelsea's post season tour of Thailand and Australia in early June, Jose Mourinho claimed that few players were better than Ivanovic, Matic and Diego Costa in their position. And he went further to assert that his Chelsea side was the best.

When the players he mentioned while the team was away in Asia are taken out of the equation, it becomes a different side entirely.

For all of Chelsea's solidity as a unit and a well drilled and organised team that comes from the manager, the team still relies heavily on the individual brilliance of Eden Hazard to unlock certain teams. When the Belgian is not on song, Chelsea usually struggles. While the addition of Cesc Fabregas last season offered more opportunity for that burden to be shared, Jose Mourinho's pragmatism means he has had to sacrifice some flair to bring defensive stability to his team. With Cesc Fabregas struggling at times to have an impact when he is played in the No 10 role, it means Mourinho would have to deploy him more in a deeper role alongside Matic, where he would be more influential, and that has its own negative effect, as the team would not be solid defensively as he Jose Mourinho would want.

Little wonder that Oscar has gradually become more of an impact sub, rather than a first team player, as the manager has opted for the energy and defensive qualities of the tireless Ramires and Willian. Both might not offer the goal threat that Oscar offers, but they are definitely sure starters in Mourinho's team.

It does not come as a surprise that Ramires has often played on the right wing when another attacking midfielder is brought in because of the protection he offers defensively.

While those of Chelsea persuasion would prefer for the team to bring in a natural right winger, it is unlikely to happen, as Jose Mourinho has displayed a penchant for selling players who he feels offers little defensively while bringing in players that he thinks can do that just like Mo Salah and Andre Schurrle were sacrificed for Juan Cuadrado.

Chelsea have one of the smallest squad amongst the top teams, and the fact that they had the fewest injuries amongst the top six last season meant the size of the squad was not an issue.

However, it remains to be seen whether there would be another safety neat of a largely injury free season in the new campaign.

With the transfer window still open, Chelsea's reinforcement might likely be in defence, a position they are already solid in. The pursuit of John Stones from Everton is still on, as well as a left back to replace the departed Felipe Luiz.

As it stands, it is difficult to identify any clear weakness in Chelsea's armoury, except when Diego Costa is absent. The weakness is more in the squad than in the team (first eleven) itself, where there might not be adequate replacement for some key first team players in the event of injury.

Van Gaal gradually erasing Ferguson’s relics

With Rafael da Silva the latest Manchester United player to leave for pastures new following his move to ligue un side Lyon, his departure continues a theme of a high turnover of players signed during the Ferguson era who have left the club in the last 18 months.

This summer alone, Nani and Robin van Persie have since left for Turkish side Fernerbache. Last season, Danny Welbeck left Old Trafford for the Emirates. Darren Fletcher joined West Brom in January, Patrice Evra left for Juventus last summer, Javier Hernandez was sent out on loan last season; the injury he suffered few months ago means no club has come to sign him permanently.

Louis van Gaal has been ruthless since he assumed the manager’s position at Old Trafford. The way he dealt with the Robin van Persie was a case in point. He stated during the club’s pre-season tour of the United States that he told his fellow Dutch national during a golf game that he was not part of his plans. Little wonder the former Feyenoord striker is now out of Old Trafford.

In spite of the fact that some players that were key furniture of the Ferguson era have now left the building because they are clearly not rated by Van Gaal, some other important players signed by the Scotsman still remain part of the manager’s plans, Wayne Rooney, Ashley Young and Micheal Carrick remains key components of the Dutchman’s team. The latter was offered a one year extension of his contract before last season ended after the existing one was due to run out this summer, while there are reports that Ashley Young is on the verge of signing a new contract.

Other players that Alex Ferguson signed that still remain part of Van Gaal’s plans are Phil Jones, Chris Smalling and Antonio Valencia. The fact that the latter featured prominently last season came as something of a surprise to many, but with the signing of Italian right back Matteo Darmian he might suffer from limited game time this season.

Two other signings of the Scots era whose futures still remain up the air by contrasting fortunes are David de Gea and Jonny Evans. For De Gea, the club wants to keep him, but with one year left on his contract, and the fact that the lure of Real Madrid still lurks around, it is one that is expected to run between now and the end of the transfer window.

Jonny Evans’ case is different with unconfirmed reports that the club is open to sell him. He was reported to have been close to a move to Everton last month, but Roberto Martinez dismissed it as untrue.

As Louis van Gaal continuous to build his own team with several signings this summer, the departure of Angel di Maria will leave a measure of disappointment for the Dutchman, for his inability to get the best out of the Argentine winger, who is now expected to sign for Paris Saint Germain after just a season at Manchester United. With Barcelona winger, Pedro expected to arrive at Old Trafford, it could mitigate for the departure of Di Maria.

The temperament of United’s manager is clearly different from that of Alex Ferguson, he has shown that he has little patience to keep players who does not fit into his plans, irrespective of whether there is a chance that they could improve or not.

Though the Ferguson era is now history, that he was able to get the best out of players like Rafael da Silva, showed the Scots qualities. Since his departure, the young Brazilian who spent eight years at Old Trafford was not the same right back he was under Ferguson. Although there was some measure of technical ability lacking in most Ferguson’s teams, however, what they lacked in technical ability, they more than made up for it with a combined will to win all the time. Something the Scotsman instilled in his players during his time as manager.

With the relics of the Ferguson era gradually giving way in terms of signings as more technically gifted players are now being brought in, it remains to be seen whether the new signings would bring the same level of success the signings made by Ferguson brought to the club.

With more players of the Ferguson era expected to leave, the question of how the Scotsman was able to get players who many agreed where not the best technically, but performed consistently would continue to remain unanswered particularly as other managers have not been able to get the same level of performance out of the same players.

Liverpool: finding a balance between signings and stability

                                                                   

Success in football is premised on different factors. While some clubs sign one or two players to improve an already existing core like Chelsea did by signing Diego Costa and Cesc Fabregas last summer, others settle for a policy of signing almost an entire team in the transfer window. These are contrasting policy that several clubs have adopted in building a competitive squad ahead of a new season. While some clubs have found success through either approach, yet very few top clubs settle for signing players that runs into double figures with an element of regularity.

Liverpool have been one of the busiest clubs in this summer’s transfer window just like last season when Brendan Rodgers and the club’s transfer committee brought in a number of players largely with the money received from the sale of Luis Suarez to Barcelona.

In the summer of 2014, Liverpool signed the following players:

• Rickie Lambert
• Adam Lallana
• Mario Balotelli
• Alberto Moreno
• Dejan Lovren
• Lazar Markovic
• Javier Manquillo (loan)
• Emre Can
• Divock Origi (signed and loaned back to Lille)

Looking at that list, Liverpool made nine signings last season. At the end Brendan Rodgers found it difficult to build on what the team at achieved in the previous season when they nearly won the Premier League title. There was stability lacking as there was seldom any existing on field partnership in the team that could have led to a consistent run of result last season. It meant that last season started poorly for the Anfield outfit.

Although, they found their feet midway through the season when they put an unbeaten run together, they still finished the season poorly. Although the series of injury suffered by Daniel Sturridge and the fact that the now departed Raheem Sterling struggled for form meant the team was unrecognisable from the one that nearly won the league the previous season.

On the theme of partnerships and combination on the field of play, it was the partnership of Suarez, Sturridge and Sterling that almost brought the title to Anfield. With that partnership gone last season, it affected the team’s stability that the rash of signings made did little last season to bridge the gap as few if not all of them failed to find their feet in their first season at Merseyside.

With the departures of Raheem Sterling and Steven Gerard to Manchester City and Major League Soccer’s Los Angles Galaxy respectively as well as the fact that Daniel Sturridge will miss the first months of the season as he continues his recovery of his hip injury, Liverpool will again start the new season with trying to find new on field partnerships with the raft of signings they have made. So far the signings made have been close the number signed last summer. The list reads.

• James Milner
• Danny Ings
• Nathaniel Clyne
• Roberto Firmino
• Christian Benteke
• Adam Bodgan
• Joe Gomez
• Allan Rodrigues

Although, it must the said that the quality of this summer’s signings could be said to be better than the players brought in last summer, the idea that Liverpool can continue with a high turnover of signing players every summer and at the same time get the balance right between stability and signings would certainly be difficult. The issue now faced by Brendan Rodgers is to fit the new signings into a system that would suit the team.

With Rickie Lambert having signed for West Brom, and the future of Mario Balotelli still up in the air, it is already an admittance that some of the signings made last summer were a mistake with the players now be shipped out after just one season at the club.

With more players being linked to Liverpool, the possibility of more signings cannot be ruled out before the transfer window closes, especially with Barcelona winger Adama Traore being strongly linked. Yet what must be a headache to Brendan Rodgers is how to fit these players into an existing system as well as find a way to keep the players happy as several of them will not get enough playing time.

With the Northern Irishman entering his fourth season with the club this summer, he will certainly be under pressure to deliver a rewarding season this time around especially with the way last season ended when the team lost 6-1 to Stoke City on the last day of the season. They have an early opportunity of avenging that defeat when they face Stoke City on the opening weekend of the new season.

With the Steven Gerard era now confined to the vehicle of history, new on field partnerships and combinations that would breed a measure of stability is now expected to be established by Brendan Rodgers, the club has again backed him in the transfer market, and there have equally been changes to his backroom staff, yet the buck stops at his table to deliver the goods this season and find a formula that would enable the signings made to kick on.

Arsenal Strikers' Dance: A Tune of Giroud and Walcott

      

Prior to Sunday's Community Shield match between Arsenal and Chelsea, lots of debate when into who Arsene Wenger would go with in the striker's role. So when the team list came an hour before kick-off, with Theo Walcott getting the nod over Oliver Giroud, there was a measure of surprise at the manager's decision to go with the 26 years old England forward. It was the second time in a row in a space of 65 days that Arsene Wenger had opted to go with Theo Walcott in a Wembley showpiece while relegating Oliver Giroud to the bench.

Yet, despite the fact that Theo Walcott assisted the goal that Oxlade-Chamberlain scored, he did little all game, and the very fact that Arsenal could not build a sustained combination and passing pattern in the final third only goes to show the limitations of playing him as a striker. During his 65 minutes on the pitch, Theo Walcott had one shot on target, just 10 touches, he made just 5 passes, and Arsenal's forward line took just three shots when he was on the pitch.

Theo Walcott's game is premised on receiving through balls from midfield, when he runs into space. Although his presence and the fact that his pace frightens opposition defence, by preventing them to push forward, as was evidenced by John Terry and Gary Cahill's reluctance to push forward. Yet that presence in that position means Arsenal are unable to successfully execute their possession based style with an element of consistency when in the opposition half. Walcott does not have the ability to hold the ball for more than a few seconds to either relieve pressure, or allow the other players in especially Santi Cazorla and Mesut Ozil to come into the game.

The question is whether Theo Walcott can add something new to his game beyond just running into through balls? His near disappearance in the second half when Arsenal struggled to keep possession allowed Chelsea to build some headway as the ball seem to return immediately to the Arsenal half as there was no player who could keep the ball beyond the halfway line. The dance of the match was essentially dictated by the tune of Walcott's limitations as a striker.

However, Arsenal's struggles in the final third changed when Theo Walcott left the fray. Oliver Giroud's introduction turned the dance around, the tune of the possession changed, the combination play between Arsenal's midfielders and forward line increased. And the statistics reflects this.

Oliver Giroud had 17 touches, 3 shots, he actually made 2 clearances, something Theo Walcott never did, he made 10 passes, double what Theo Walcott made and in less than half the time.

And to cap it up, the Arsenal forward line took 8 shots during Oliver Giroud’s time on the pitch.

The dance of both strikers is very different, while Theo Walcott will offer pace and very little else, Oliver Giroud's dance offers everything else apart from pace. Yet on the balance of play, he is very instrumental to the way Arsenal plays and wants to play.

However, Arsene Wenger has pointedly laid a marker of what he intends to do in that position this season.

He remarked after Sunday's match,

"I want to use him there [Striker] as well.

It all depends on the opposition"

What Arsene Wenger has essentially said is that he would be deploying a rotation policy between Theo Walcott and Oliver Giroud depending on the opposition.

Yet, Arsenal's midfield and defence would have to be ready to work overload in most matches when Theo Walcott is deployed as a striker. Nothing much would be expected on the defensive side from him. Many would say he is there to score goals whenever he is played as a striker. But with just pace on offer from the England forward, plus little ability to keep hold of possession for a sustained period up top, it would actually look like Arsenal are playing with ten players at times.

One thing that is clear is that the team particularly Mesut Ozil and Santi Cazorla still have to get used to playing with Theo Walcott as a centre forward if that is the position Arsene Wenger would use him more this season. Because the two matches at Wembley which he started has seen him offer very little besides his goal and assist. Whether it is something Arsene Wenger will persist with is another factor.

No doubt, there are times Theo Walcott's deployment as a striker would definitely work a treat and it would be hailed, and there will be other moments, it would end in disappointment.

The idea of him being Arsenal's first choice centre forward would not sit well with most Gunners, because of his limitations, but if his pace becomes a fear factor for opposition defences before a match kicks off, it becomes itself a psychological edge for Arsenal, and it means no opposition team would prefer playing a high line when they face Arsenal.

With Oliver Giroud a different variant in the striker's stables, he could end up being the plan B for some matches this season if Theo Walcott as Plan A fails. But one thing that should be noted is that if Theo Walcott starts scoring consistently as a centre forward despite the fact that he offers more as a winger, it would be difficult to keep him from not playing as centre forward, yet as Arsene Wenger has stated, it will depend on the opposition at the end of the day.

Arsenal Beat Chelsea at Their Own Game

Over the years Arsene Wenger’s Arsenal have suffered at the hands of Jose Mourinho's Chelsea, but it was a different scenario on Sunday. The manner in which the victory was attained is what has elicited a rather ironic comment from the blues manager. More on that later.

Before the match itself, a lot was said regarding the fact that the match was more than a glorified friendly, with players still working their way to full fitness before the season starts in earnest. But the manner in which Mourinho shuffled and tweaked his tactics to get an equaliser in the match, showed the match meant more to him than it was portrayed.

The first tweak arrived at half time, when Loic Remy love affair with going off side was brought to an early end when he was replaced by Radamel Falcao who it must be admitted has a lot of work to do to turn his reputation around in English football after he struggled with Manchester United last season. Mourinho's last tweak saw John Terry withdrawn, with Victor Moses introduced late on in his stead, as he pushed to level the match. Oscar, Kurt Zouma all entered the fray; Cesc Fabregas was moved from his position further up the pitch earlier on to play in a deeper role. Yet Chelsea struggled to create clear cut chances, and when the few chances they created arrived Eden Hazard blazed over, while Ramires contrived to miss a point blank header from six yards in the first half.

In a fixture involving Arsenal and Chelsea, it is unusual for Chelsea to have more possession. Chelsea had 57% possession in the match, but only had two shots on target, and they were largely restricted to few chances. That Arsenal scored their only goal early on certainly aided their cause. The goal aided their plans to protect what they had while hitting Chelsea on the counter-attack, and they could and should have scored more than one goal after the chances they had late on.

If this defensive quality to protect a lead for 70 minutes was deployed by Jose Mourinho, it would have been accepted as the norm, and true to form that was what Chelsea used to get the better of most of their rivals last season even at Stamford Bridge, with the tie against Manchester United a key example.

That Arsenal opted to abandon their caviar approach by going pragmatic was a case of beating Jose Mourinho's Chelsea at an approach he has perfected over the years. And this particular obdurate display by the Gunners obviously came as shock to Jose Mourinho. He remarked after the match.

"Arsenal defended with 10 players, they put everybody in front of their own line and they had good organisation, congratulations to them. They had a couple of chances in counter attacks but we had ours in organised football. They played their game tactically and found themselves one goal in front without any reason"

It was quite ironic for the Portuguese manager to accuse his opponent of deploying ten men behind the ball, seeing that he had used it to good effect in the past, and when it has worked he has been hailed as a tactical genius, but when same tactics is used to get one over him, it becomes a case of a team parking the bus in front of their penalty area.

While nothing much can be read into the match in respect of how the season would unfold for both teams, the intensity of the match and the tackles that flew in, reflected what the match meant to the players especially for an Arsenal side that had failed to beat Chelsea under Jose Mourinho in 13 previous attempts.

Per Mertesacker was also quick to point out that the team was still really in pre-season despite the win over Chelsea.

However, from a psychological point of view, the victory can be term a huge one for the gunners as the last hurdle that remained in their struggles against the big teams was beating Mourinho's Chelsea. After wins over Manchester City and Manchester United last season in the league and FA Cup, the players have gradually broken a mental barrier that would be a platform to build on as the season unfolds in earnest.

That these victories were achieved through a pragmatic approach only goes to show a new pattern that has emerged in the way Arsene Wenger is prepared to go when it comes to certain matches.

The Community Shield on Sunday is just a modicum sub plot to the season, and come May 2016, it would have paled into insignificance as the season would be decided on other factors, Arsenal might have gotten the first scalp, but they have to build on this victory and avoid the pitfalls of last season when the win over Manchester City in last season's Community Shield proved a false dawn as they won just two of their opening nine matches after that.

A good and consistent start in the early weeks would show what Arsenal can offer this season, and as for Chelsea, they welcome Fiorentina to Stamford Bridge on Wednesday as they continue their build up to the new season.

Can Arsenal lay Mourinho's Unbeaten Jibes to rest?

                                                        

image: English FA

The curtain raiser of the English Premier League season takes place on Sunday with league champions Chelsea taking on FA Cup winners Arsenal at Wembley. With the history between both managers, Arsene Wenger and Jose Mourinho, it has given added spice to the game. And true to this pattern, the media had sought to stoke the fire ahead of the game, but Arsene Wenger has adopted a measured approach by not giving in to what the media would ordinarily prey on. The Frenchman replying along these lines "we don't listen to what others say"

This was in response to Jose Mourinho's claims that Arsenal were trying to buy the title because of their spending over the last three years. However the enigmatic Portuguese did not stop there.

He has also been quick to remind everyone about the number of times he has gone unbeaten against Arsene Wenger. At present it stands at 13. (D6 7L) and coupled with that Arsenal have not scored against Chelsea for almost 500 minutes.

The self-styled special one claims he would have found a solution to that unbeaten run if he was the manager, asserting that West Brom’s Tony Pulis was a more difficult rival having lost to him on two occasions.

The Chelsea manager never shies away from making comments that the media keeps up and run with with an element of voracious glee. Yet, on many occasions he has been rewarded even after making such remarks prior to a match, because his teams have always delivered on the day.

Being a pragmatic manager, his first approach to a game his to set his team not to lose, a tactics that has played into Chelsea's hands on numerous occasions when they have come up against Arsenal.

Yet, the community Shield on Sunday is different in more ways than one. Although the Chelsea manager stated it is more than a friendly, the stakes for the match is high in the eyes of many because of the recent history between both clubs.

Arsenal are coming into the match after a flawless pre-season campaign, where they won their matches without conceding a goal, and it is the second season in a row they would be playing in the community shield. They defeated Manchester City 3-0 last time out.

The Arsenal squad coming into this season has been tipped for a sustained title challenge. The signing of Petr Cech has added experience to a back line that is already settled.

Arsenal and Arsene Wenger would want to avoid the pitfalls of last season where they started the season poorly despite defeating Manchester City in the Community Shield last season.

Although, Sunday's match would not have a direct bearing on the destination of the title, it could however aid in breaking a mental block that has stopped Arsenal from beating Chelsea under the stewardship of Jose Mourinho.

The fact that it is a neutral ground and no advantage so to speak to either teams, should make the game a less territorial affair.

With the nature of the game, and the fact that it attracts more than the normal substitutions allowed, it takes the feel of a friendly match.

Yet, such a match only means nothing to the team that lose at the end of the day, whoever wins will get the opportunity of lifting a trophy, and a confidence boost ahead of the new season.

It will be the 14th game between Arsenal and Chelsea have contested under both managers, and the second time both managers would be meeting in the Community Shield since 2005 when Arsenal lost to Chelsea.

In the end, every unbeaten run eventually comes to end, and after what has gone before the game, it should be an interesting match.

Possible Line Up:

Arsenal:

Petr Cech, Mathieu Debuchy, Per Mertesacker, Laurent Koscielny, Nacho Monreal, Francis Coquelin, Santi Cazorla, Mesut Ozil, Oxlade-Chamberlain, Aaron Ramsey, Oliver Giroud.

Chelsea:

Courtois, Branisav Ivanonic, John Terry, Gary Cahill, Caesar Azpilicueta, Nemanja Matic, Ramires, Cesc Fabregas, Eden Hazard, William, Diego Costa